dc.contributor.author | Çetin, Onat | |
dc.contributor.author | Işık, Özkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Beyleroğlu, Malik | |
dc.contributor.author | Tokul, Erdi | |
dc.contributor.author | Hazar, Muhsin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-26T08:57:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-26T08:57:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1318-2269 - 2232-4062 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/12479 | |
dc.description | Işık, Özkan (Balikesir Author) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to examine the effects of two different defensive based playing formations (3-Defender formation and 4-Defender formation) on both the reference and the opponent teams' running activity profiles. 8 official matches (n=4, 3-Defender formation; n=4, 4-Defender formation) of Galatasaray football team (Turkish Super League) and opposition teams performed with two different playing formations were monitored. The sample matches were monitored and analyzed using a multiple-camera computerized tracking system. Running activity data variables obtained from the software were analyzed in 5 different categories (total running distance in kilometers, mean speed in km.h(-1), high-intensity running (20 km.h(-1) to 24 km.h(-1)) distance in meters, sprint (>24 km.h(-1)) distance, sprint numbers. The results of this study indicate that running activity profiles of reference and opposition teams generally do not differ (p >0.05) according to the different game formation of the reference team. Only the reference team's total running distance was higher (p <0.05) in the 4-Defender formation than the 3-Defender formation (2.52%). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Namen študije je bil preučiti učinke dveh različnih
obrambnih igralnih formacij (3 obrambna formacija
in 4 obrambna formacija) tako na referenčnih
profilih kot na profilih tekaških aktivnosti nasprotnih
ekip. Spremljali smo 8 uradnih tekem (n = 4, 3
obrambna formacija; n = 4, 4 obrambna formacija)
nogometne ekipe Galatasaray (turška superliga) in
nasprotne ekipe, ki so nastopile z dvema različnima
formacijama. Vzorčne ujemanje smo spremljali in
analizirali z računalniškim sistemom, ki za sledenje
uporablja več kamer. Spremenljivke podatkov o
tekaški aktivnosti, pridobljene s programsko
opremo, so bile analizirane v 5 različnih kategorijah
(skupna razdalja teka v kilometrih, povprečna hitrost
v km.h-1
, tek z visoko intenzivnostjo (20 km.h-1 do
24 km.h-1
) razdalja v metrih, sprinterska (> 24 km.h1
) razdalja, število sprintov. Rezultati te študije
kažejo, da se profili tekaških aktivnosti referenčnih
in nasprotnih ekip na splošno ne razlikujejo (p>
0,05) glede na različno obliko igre je bila skupna
tekaška razdalja referenčne ekipe v 4 obrambni
formaciji višja (p <0,05) kot v 3 obrambni formaciji
(2,52%). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Univ Ljubljana, Fac Sport | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Playing Formation | en_US |
dc.subject | Running Activity Profile | en_US |
dc.subject | Time-Motion Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Igralna Formacija | en_US |
dc.subject | Profil Tekaške Aktivnosti | en_US |
dc.subject | Analiza Časovnega Gibanja | en_US |
dc.title | A comparison of two different defensive based playing formations on the running activity profiles of soccer teams | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Primerjava dveh različnih obrambenih igralnih formacij na tekalno zmogljivost nogometašev | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Kinesiologia Slovenica | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | 0000-0003-2561-1695 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 62 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 71 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |