Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorManas, Ceren Kencebay
dc.contributor.authorDerin, Narin
dc.contributor.authorArıcan, Ramazan Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorTanrıöver, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorDilmaç, Sayra
dc.contributor.authorÖzcanlı, Haluk
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T11:31:54Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T11:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn0161-6412 / 1743-1328
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2022.2029293
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/13651
dc.descriptionArıcan, Ramazan Yavuz (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractAim We aimed to investigate the effects of erythropoietin, acetyl-l-carnitine, and their combination on nerve regeneration in experimental peripheral nerve injury. Methods Rats were randomly divided into five groups - sham-operated (S), sciatic nerve crush injury (C), C + acetyl-l-carnitine (ALCAR), C + erythropoietin (EPO), and C + EPO + ALCAR. ALCAR (50 mg/kg/day) was administered intraperitoneally, and EPO (5000 U/kg) was injected subcutaneously for 10 days. Functional recovery was evaluated using walking track analysis (sciatic functional index [SFI]), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) assay, and caspase-3 and S100 immunoreactivities. Results In SFI analyses, delayed functional recovery was observed in the C group, whereas the functional recovery of rats treated with EPO and ALCAR significantly improved. The latencies of the SEP components were significantly prolonged in C group. In the treatment groups (C + EPO, C + ALCAR, and C + EPO + ALCAR), all recorded values of SEP components significantly decreased. TBARS levels in C group were significantly higher than those in the S group. EPO and ALCAR administration significantly decreased TBARS levels. Caspase-3 immunoreactivity was increased in the C group, whereas it was decreased in the treatment groups. S100 immunolabelling was significantly decreased in the C group. EPO and ALCAR administration caused an increase in the amount of S100-positive cells in all treatment groups. Conclusion EPO and ALCAR administration could accelerate sciatic nerve repair by reducing apoptosis and lipid peroxidation and promoting myelinization. Although both EPO and ALCAR had positive effects on nerve healing, their combined efficacy had no statistically significant effect on peripheral nerve regeneration.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAkdeniz University 2011.01.0103.005en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/01616412.2022.2029293en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPeripheral Nerve Injuryen_US
dc.subjectsciatic Nerve Injuryen_US
dc.subjectErythropoietinen_US
dc.subjectAcetyl-l-carnitineen_US
dc.subjectNerve Regenerationen_US
dc.titleComparison of the therapeutic effects of erythropoietin and acetyl-l-carnitine on sciatic nerve injury in ratsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalNeurological Researchen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-7668-1103en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-1080-6791en_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage659en_US
dc.identifier.endpage666en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster