Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAzbar, Nuri
dc.contributor.authorSpeece, R.E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-03T06:14:49Z
dc.date.available2019-09-03T06:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-9372
dc.identifier.issn1943-7870
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:3(240)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/6195
dc.descriptionAzbar, Nuri (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this research, three anaerobic process configurations-namely, two-phase dual sludge (TPDS), two-stage single sludge (TSSS), and single-stage-were evaluated for effluent COD concentration. The same temperature, SRT, and glucose substrate were used in all experiments. In every case, TPDS and TSSS configurations significantly outperformed the single stage. All experiments were carried out at a temperature of 35 degreesC, end all reactors were operated as daily fill-and-draw with HRT = SRT. The following ranges for each design parameter were studied: pH (4.5, 5.5, and 6.5); first stage HRT (3, 8, and 24 h); and flee load (3, 9, and 27 gCOD/gVSS). The overall HRT/SRT of all systems was 30 days, and a pH-Stat system was used to control the pH in the acidification reactors at the desired value. Statistical evaluation of the results indicated that a flee load of 3 in the first reactor of TPDS yielded the lowest effluent COD concentrations under the studied range of parameters, while fur the TSSS reactor configuration the staging of the system itself was the controlling phenomena responsible for reduced effluent GOD.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAsce-Amer Soc Civil Engineersen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:3(240)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFluidized-Bed Reactorsen_US
dc.subjectWaste-Water Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectDigestionen_US
dc.subjectSeparationen_US
dc.subjectGlucoseen_US
dc.subjectStabilizationen_US
dc.subjectDegradationen_US
dc.subjectHydrolysisen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectGelatinen_US
dc.titleTwo-phase, two-stage, and single-stage anaerobic process comparisonen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume127en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage240en_US
dc.identifier.endpage248en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster