Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Mehmet Oğuz
dc.contributor.authorŞen, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorIrer, Bora
dc.contributor.authorOngün, Şakir
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Güner
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T11:01:30Z
dc.date.available2021-02-25T11:01:30Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn1368-5031
dc.identifier.issn1742-1241
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13844
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/11095
dc.descriptionOngün, Şakir (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective We aimed to investigate the predictive ability of the Hounsfield unit (HU) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for the success of medical expulsive therapy (MET) using silodosin in distal ureteric stones of 4-10 mm. Methodology The data of patients who underwent MET were retrospectively screened. The patients were divided into two groups as Groups 1 and 2 depending on the presence or absence of stone expulsion, respectively. In addition to HU calculated using the NCCT images, state of the collecting systems, daily fluid intake, number of emergency department visits, and number of pain attacks were compared. Results A total of 88 patients were included in the study. Sixty-four patients (72.7%) expelled the stone after MET while the treatment was not successful in 24 patients (27.3%). The stone area was significantly larger in Group 2 (28.4 +/- 15.7 mm(2) vs 46.8 +/- 16.1 mm(2); P < .001). NCCT-HU was calculated as 542.5 +/- 256.8 for Group 1 and 873.1 +/- 335.2 for Group 2, indicating a significant difference (P < .001). The mean number of pain attacks was 1.5 +/- 1.2 in Group 1 and 2.2 +/- 1.4 in Group 2 (P = .048). The number of visits to the emergency department significantly differed between Groups 1 and 2 (1.1 +/- 1.0 and 1.8 +/- 1.3, respectively; P = .010). Conclusions In this study, HU and stone area values calculated on NCCT were found to be effective factors in predicting the treatment success for MET. Therefore, we consider that it would be useful to consider these parameters in the selection of an appropriate treatment for distal ureteric stones.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/ijcp.13844en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComputed-Tomography Findingsen_US
dc.subjectShock-Wave Lithotripsyen_US
dc.subjectTamsulosinen_US
dc.subjectEfficacyen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectUreteroscopyen_US
dc.subjectAlfuzosinen_US
dc.titleCan the Hounsfield unit predict the success of medical expulsive therapy using silodosin in 4-to 10-mm distal ureteral stones?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-2832-0682en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-0495-9863en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-1985-9312en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-8253-4086en_US
dc.identifier.volumeEarly Access: DEC 2020en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage5en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster