Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorIrer, Bora
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Mehmet Oğuz
dc.contributor.authorErbatu, Oğuzcan
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Alperen
dc.contributor.authorOngün, Şakir
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Önder
dc.contributor.authorCihan, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T10:21:57Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T10:21:57Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983
dc.identifier.issn1433-8726
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02809-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/11387
dc.descriptionOngün, Şakir (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose We aimed to evaluate the impact of previous unsuccessful shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) therapy on ureterorenoscopy (URS) outcomes in proximal ureteral stones and to define whether there is any optimal timing for safe URS after SWL. Methods The patients who underwent URS for proximal ureteral stones between the years 2015 and 2018 in eight centers were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to previous SWL history; group 1 consisted of patients without SWL before URS for the stone [SWL (-)] and group 2 consisted of patients with a previous SWL for the stone [SWL (+)]. Demographics, operation outcomes and stone characteristics were compared between these two groups. Regarding the complication and success rates, optimal timing for URS after SWL for the stone was calculated with receiver operator characteristics curve analysis. Results Totally 638 patients were included (group 1: 466 patients and group 2: 172 patients). The operation and hospitalization times, rate of ureteral stenting and complications were significantly higher in group 2. Stone free status was similar between the groups. Optimal timing for URS after SWL was calculated as 16.5 days (AUC = 0.657, p = 0.012) with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 72%, regarding the complication rates. Complication rates were significantly higher in patients who were operated before 16.5 days (27.7% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusions The optimal timing; 2-3 weeks delay of the URS procedure after unsuccessful SWL may decrease complication rates according to our results.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00345-019-02809-4en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectProximal Ureteral Stoneen_US
dc.subjectShock Wave Lithotripsyen_US
dc.subjectStoneen_US
dc.subjectUreterorenoscopyen_US
dc.subjectUrolithiasisen_US
dc.titleImpact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stonesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalWorld Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-0107-5843en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-5586-8673en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-2832-0682en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-7719-9033en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-8253-4086en_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage769en_US
dc.identifier.endpage774en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster