Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorChin, Paul C.
dc.contributor.authorHachadorian, Michael E
dc.contributor.authorPulido, Pamela A.
dc.contributor.authorMunro, Michelle L.
dc.contributor.authorMeriç, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorHoenecke, Heinz R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-17T06:42:06Z
dc.date.available2019-10-17T06:42:06Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.issn1058-2746
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.052
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/7352
dc.descriptionMeriç, Gökhan (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior wear of the glenoid and posterior subluxation of the humerus (Walch type B) presents a challenge to the treating surgeon. Our hypothesis was that glenoids with biconcavity (B2) would be associated with worse outcomes (functional scores and complications) than B1 glenoids. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 112 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (104 patients) with B glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography identified 64 B1 glenoids and 48 B2 glenoids (50 and 37 available for follow-up). Results: A significant difference between B1 and B2 glenoids was noted in average retroversion (11 degrees vs. 16 degrees; P < .001) and average posterior humeral subluxation (65% vs. 75%; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in mean age (69.5 vs. 69.2 years) or body mass index (28.5 vs. 27.4) at time of surgery. At average follow-up of 60 months (range, 23-120 months), glenoid component radiolucencies (51.6%, B1; 47.9%, B2), range of motion, preoperative and postoperative scores of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Four revisions (4.6%) were documented for acute postoperative infection (2.3%), subscapularis failure (1.1%), and glenoid loosening (1.1%). Conclusions: Although biconcave glenoids commonly have more severe retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humerus, we were unable to find a clinical or radiographic difference in outcome of patients with B1 or B2 glenoids treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty at intermediate-term follow-up. Continued clinical and radiographic follow-up of these cohorts will be necessary to assess any future divergence in outcome.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScripps Clinic Medical Groupen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.052en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Osteoarthritisen_US
dc.subjectBiconcave Glenoiden_US
dc.subjectType B Glenoiden_US
dc.titleOutcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis in type B glenoidsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-8035-2193en_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1888en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1893en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster