| dc.contributor.author | İzgi, Ümit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Şeker, Burcu Sezginsoy | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-17T12:20:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-10-17T12:20:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1877-0428 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.089 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/8950 | |
| dc.description | Şeker, Burcu Sezginsoy (Balikesir Author) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this article is to compare various formulas to determine the readability levels of texts in 4th and 5th grade Social Science and Science-Technology text books. For this purpose, "Flesch, FOG, Gunning, Sonmez and Atesman" readability formulas were used. The study sample comprised of randomly selected 4 texts which were used in 4th and 5th grade Social Science and Science-Technology textbooks in the 2009-2010 academic year at Ankara. As a result, when the readability levels of texts in the textbooks are examined, it has been revealed that the results of formulas' are not consistent with each other. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Science Bv | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.089 | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Readability | en_US |
| dc.subject | Science and Technology Text Book | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social Science Text Book | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparing different readability formulas on the examples of science-technology and social science textbooks | en_US |
| dc.type | conferenceObject | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | 4th World Conference on Educational Sciences (Wces-2012) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 46 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 178 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 182 | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
